Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 24th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Don't punish essential 4x4 users plea



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

ESSENTIAL users of larger four-wheel-drive vehicles should not be penalised by the same green taxes as those who choose to use them, but have no real need.

That is the argument of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), which is campaigning for the Government to recognise essential 4x4 users and grant them some relief.

The CLA in the North has repeated its call that rural people who need 4x4 vehicles for their work are not penalised by the green levies set to tax the so-called "Chelsea Tractor" brigade.

Douglas Chalmers, pictured, the CLA's northern director, said: "No-one disputes the environmental effect of the vehicles on our roads, but there is a world of difference between drivers who need a 4x4 and those who simply want one. It is high time Government recognised that distinction.

"Farmers, forestry workers and those with equine businesses are only some of the people whose vehicles have to be suitable for all conditions, and often these have to double up as the family car. Towing regulations can insist on the use of heavier vehicles.

"We mustn't forget the other essential users in rural areas either, especially in the caring professions. I for one can remember a dark Sunday evening one January when the county was paralysed by snow and one of our children was ill. We were so relieved when the doctor arrived in his 4x4 vehicle.

"For some rural doctors and nurses a 4x4 means they can reach some of their patients, and other services such as Mountain Rescue simply couldn't function without these practical vehicles. Mountain Rescue relies entirely on public donations and it seems crazy to add to their costs through sledgehammer legislation.

"These taxes hit hardest those who most need the vehicles, and who have to continue using them. Essential users are, in effect, subsidising those who buy large vehicles as a fashion statement and that is simply wrong.

"Surely we can devise a system that recognises 'essential users' and relieves them from punitive levies designed to tax an entirely different type of owner. In the short term we are looking at ways by which users of essential rural vehicles can identify themselves as such to avoid being judged wrongly by others."

The full article contains 381 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2008 3:00 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Clitheroe
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.